The relationship between outcrossing point and you may collective exercise wasn’t high (quadratic regression: F

The relationship between outcrossing point and you may collective exercise wasn’t high (quadratic regression: F

For two tree types for the Sri Lanka’s wet zone woods, good fresh fruit lay increased significantly having outcrossing length, peaking on intermediate-point within this-forest crosses (1–10 kilometer based on kinds). Inside the crosses anywhere between trees occupying independent tree reserves, but not, fruits put is notably shorter (otherwise nearly therefore) for both types. Alternatively, seed products germination and you can seedling height at the step one year to have Sh. cordifolia recommended crossbreed energy in between-tree crosses. The effects regarding nearest-neighbor mating ranged among woods and variety; the latest indicate physical fitness price of nearby-next-door neighbor mating in line with mating that have meagerly alot more distant locals is 45% to possess S. rubicundum and you may 0% for Sh. cordifolia. On the other hand, this new fitness outcomes of anywhere between-forest crossing was basically large both for kinds (52 and 70% relative to contained in this-forest crosses for the very same a few kinds). Crossing effects decreased between your amounts out of fruits set and you can step 1-yr-dated seedling proportions; just the former is actually significant both for kinds. Efficiency indicate a strong prospect of biparental inbreeding despair contained in this tree forest populations and you can limited reproductive isolation one of woods consuming the rest tree reserves inside the Sri Lanka’s wet region.

Inbreeding depression is usually quoted since the an inevitable consequence of anthropogenic interference so you’re able to exotic forest (elizabeth.grams., tree fragmentation, logging), in which idea predicts you to typical mating designs within this currently low-thickness forest communities was shifted so you’re able to choose small-range crosses. So far, however, the effects from increased near-neighbor mating to possess populace fitness when you look at the exotic woods enjoys yet , so you can feel quantified empirically. Several important concerns become treated is: Would people avoid maturing vegetables produced from close-neighbors crosses and you can, or even, just how complement is actually close-neighbor-derived progeny in line with other people? This study analyzes the consequences of near-neighbor mating in 2 exotic tree varieties yourself courtesy exercise contrasting out-of crosses ranging from nearest locals with crosses associated with more distant mates.

Shorea cordifolia (Dipterocarpaceae) try a locally abundant fundamental shelter servizi incontro thai species one plants greatly at the unpredictable supra-yearly intervals (I. A good. U. Letter. Gunatilleke et al., unpublished analysis). Plant life of this kinds is actually white and you will brief-stayed, while the winged fresh fruit try distributed by the wind or gravity. For its extremely limited seeds dispersal, genetic relatedness certainly one of close natives into the absolute tree is anticipated to end up being highest. In signed forest at Sinharaja, Sh. cordifolia constantly takes place in clumps regarding ?5–20 people, intermixed with shorter stems (individual observation).

Data research

For both species, within-treatment variation among maternal trees in fruit set was substantial for all outcrosses involving pollen donors within Sinharaja Reserve. In contrast, variation in fruit set rate was very low for between-forest crosses (Fig. 2). For Sh. cordifolia, fruit set for the distant between-forest treatment ranged from only 0.5 to 0.6% and was significantly lower than the mean fruit set rate for all within-forest outcrossing treatments combined (mean = 2.71%, Fstep 1,58 = 9.94, P < 0.0003). For S. rubicundum, mean fruit set for the distant between-forest treatment (2.67%) was low relative to mean fruit set rate for all within-forest outcrossing treatments combined (mean = 5.97%). The difference was nearly significant (Fstep one,58 = 3.78, P < 0.06).

For Sh. cordifolia, cumulative fitness was maximum at both the distant neighbor and distant within-forest treatments (Fig. 5). Peak cumulative fitness observed for these intermediate crossing treatments was 2 and 4.3 times the cumulative fitnesses of the nearest-neighbor and distant between-forest treatments, respectively, although these differences were not significant (Table 3B). 2,8 = 3.70, P = 0.073). Mean cumulative fitness of open-pollinated flowers exceeded that of all other hand-pollination treatments, again likely due to the detrimental effect of the hand-pollination procedure on fruit set in this species. As for fruit set, mean cumulative fitness (relative) of the distant between-forest treatment (mean = 0.12) was significantly lower than that of all within-forest outcrossed classes combined (mean = 0.51, Fstep 1,a dozen = 8.77, P = 0.012).

Near-next-door neighbor crossing impact

Near-neighbor crossing effects have been demonstrated for a number of coniferous species (Coles and Fowler, 1976; Park and Fowler, 1982, 1984; Latta et al., 1998), but only three studies have yielded evidence of near-neighbor crossing effects in woody angiosperms (Syzygium cormiflorum-Crome and Irvine, 1986; Schiedea spp.-Sakai, Karoly, and Weller, 1989; Eucalyptus globules-Hardner, Potts, and Gore, 1998). In another study suggestive of biparental inbreeding depression, mean fruit set rates were significantly lower for intraspecific crosses <0.5 km distance than for crosses >1 km distance for three subcanopy tree species (Inga spp.) in Costa Rica (Koptur, 1984). In fact, it may be that biparental inbreeding depression is common in natural populations of forest trees, but that estimation of its potential through experimental cross-pollinations has been limited to only a few species due to the obvious difficulty of working in the canopy. To my knowledge, there are no published reports of failed attempts to find near-neighbor crossing effects in natural populations of forest trees.

Leave a Reply